The grassroots organizations working on informal peace-building do so through daily efforts to rebuild society. Through practical support, women build peace from below and rebuild and improve people`s daily lives. They provide food, shelter, health services, education, empowerment and economic support to victims of sexual and gender-based violence. Some of them are internally displaced persons and are the subject of discussion forums on women`s issues, such as insecurity of rebel groups, early pregnancy and income-generating activities. The components of the procedure define the processes that establish and maintain peace. They are re-developing the ECONOMY of a peace process by defining the processes and actions that contribute to the construction of peace. These include setting timetables and institutions to facilitate the implementation of substantive issues such as elections, justice, human rights and disarmament. Peace agreements are not always structured in the same way. Sometimes it is just a document made up of different chapters or discrete components. In other cases, any essential element may be part of a comprehensive agreement or be a separate agreement negotiated separately and at different times in a peace process. The content of an agreement also differs from conflict to conflict. The nature of war, the contentious issues and how to end the war are factors that will change the structure and content of a peace agreement. Civil or national wars are usually caused by a failure of governance.
Peace agreements that end these conflicts often focus on rebuilding governance mechanisms. Disputed issues in intergovernmental wars are normally related to security or territory. Peace agreements that end intergovernmental conflicts focus primarily on agreements to improve security and clarify territorial issues. [2] Thus, in each of these cases, the content of the peace agreements will obviously be different. How to end a war also has an impact on the content of an agreement. Violent conflicts, whether internal or interpersonal, usually end in one of three ways: an agreement on the terms of surrender, a partial agreement or a comprehensive peace agreement. [3] It is important to focus on strategies for power-sharing, election observation and nation-building in order to achieve a full understanding of the structuring of peace agreements after civil war. While each issue may seem small in itself, the success or failure of a particular national peace agreement generally relates to the success of these provisions. A peace process (or transition process) is a formal attempt to bring the protagonists of the conflict to a mutual agreement to resolve the conflict. The drama, like conflict, deals with dispute resolution measures. As by the opening quotation of the article (any use of theatre is a political activity and activity of resistance; the crossing of the border between objectification and subjectivity (Prentki 2009:252).
The strength of drama in peace-building work lies in its power to open up new and unimaginable ideas, by experiencing physical and emotional conflicts that learn through action and feeling. The theatrical process for peace-building is a political process that takes place today and requires people to consciously strive to create and be associated with them (Kelleher 2009). The drama provokes actions that require reactions and reactions so that it can influence, stimulate, inform and educate (Kelleher 2009:10). WFP scientists calculated an unweighted average of women`s representation as mediators, signatories and negotiators in the sample of important peace processes between 1992 and 2019, which are in the interactive. Data collection for these indicators was based on the following assumptions and methods. See below the data sources for some peace processes and data mining for the entire dataset.